MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vulnerabilidade socioambiental e desenvolvimento motor de lactentes expostos ao HIV

2018· article· en· W2795848921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Moretto Corrêa, Cristina dos Santos Cardoso de Sá

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ciência em Extensão · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Vertical transmission (TV) is the main responsible for the infection of children under 13 years of age by HIV and certain care should be taken to prevent transmission of the virus, cesarean section, non-breastfeeding, pre- and administration of antiretroviral drugs by the mother and infant. It is known that HIV has an affinity for the immune and central nervous system (CNS), which can cause especially important neurological changes in children. Therefore, considering the exposure to the virus, the amount of medication and the prolonged time to HIV negative in infants, it is extremely important to monitor the neuromotor development of these infants, allowing diagnostic and therapeutic intervention when necessary. The study evaluated the motor development of infants exposed to HIV in their first year of life and identified the care they performed Methods: We evaluated 13 infants born to HIV-positive mothers who were followed up at SENIC at four, eight and 12 months of age using the Motor Scale Children of Alberta (AIMS). Prenatal and birth data were obtained from the infant's chart or interview with the mother and / or the caregiver. Results: This study found that 30.76% of infants with four months and 15.38% of infants with eight months had a delay in neuropsychomotor development, but all were normalized. All infants received antiretroviral (ARV) and fed a milk formula. The majority of mothers attended prenatal care with adequate prophylaxis during gestation, during delivery and most of the users underwent cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Prenatal quality as well as prophylaxis of the mother and infant have been correctly controlled by the health service. In relation to neuropsychomotor development, less than half of the infants presented a suspicion of delay at four and eight months, normalized to 12 months. The most evident risk factors correspond to the vulnerability of the socioenvironmental context that influences the development of the infant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Ciência em ExtensãoSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207