Child Heroes of the Working Class: Working-Class Tales for Youth in Nineteenth-Century Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: Cette dissertation est la deuxieme dans une serie qui cherche a examiner la courte fiction d'aventure publiee par et a propos du Canada et les Canadiens dans les perodiques pour les jeunes des Etats-Unis et de la Grande-Bretagne entre les annees 1870 et 1914. Si souvent analyses pour les vues colonialistes et imperialistes, les contes ont aussi beaucoup a reveler au sujet des systemes de croyances et de valeurs enfonces. Parmi cette collection de contes ouvrieres on trouve de l'evidence que les valeurs considerees evidentes pour les educateurs et reformateurs des moyennes et hautes classes ainsi que les auteurs des contes etaient contestables, sinon antithetiques aux valeurs de la communaute ouvriere. Un genre de focalisation double de voie de classe se produit qui fait un examen a nouveau de perceptions de classe et d'allegeances essentielles. Summary: This essay, the second in a series, examines short adventure fiction by and about Canada and Canadians published in popular U.S. and British periodicals for youth between 1870 and 1914. While similar tales have often been analyzed from colonialist and imperialist perspectives, the unfamiliar stories in this collection reveal much about embedded societal beliefs and value systems that speak directly to working-class ideology. These stories provide evidence that the values considered self-evident to middle-class authors, readers, educators, and social reformers were questionable, if not antithetical, to the values of the working-class people who form the subject of many of the tales. A double focalization of class voice occurs in these stories in ways that make a reconsideration of class perceptions and allegiances essential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".