MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795948892 · doi:10.4271/2018-01-0213

An Experimental Study on the Knock Mitigation Effect of Coolant and Thermal Boundary Temperatures in Spark Ignited Engines

2018· article· en· W2795948892 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Seokwon Cho, Chiheon Song, Sechul Oh, Kyoungdoug Min, Kyoung-Pyo Ha, Back-Sik Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoHyundai Motor GroupAutomotive Research Center
KeywordsCoolantSPARK (programming language)Nuclear engineeringThermalMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing compression ratio is essential for developing future high-efficiency engines due to the intrinsic characteristics of spark-ignited engines. However, it also causes the unfavorable, abnormal knocking phenomena which is the auto-ignition in the unburned end-gas region. To cope with regulations, many researchers have been experimenting with various methods to suppress knock occurrence. In this paper, it is shown that cooling the combustion chamber using coolants, which is one of the most practical methods, has a strong effect on knock mitigation. Furthermore, the relationship between thermal boundary and coolant temperatures is shown. In the beginning of this paper, knock metrics using an in-cylinder pressure sensor are explained for readers, even though entire research studies cannot be listed due to the innumerableness. The coolant passages for the cylinder head and the liner were separated to examine independent cooling strategies. In addition, piston surface temperature was changed through the oil supply to the piston oil gallery. To investigate the effects on the thermal boundary temperature under knocking conditions, temperatures were measured. Knock mitigation effects were quantified while the coolant temperatures were varied. Quantification in this study consists of two methods: The advancement of the crank angle ignition timing and the expansion of the borderline knock (detonation border line). The different impacts of cooling between PFI (port fuel injection) and GDI (gasoline direct injection) engines and the differences under various S/B (stroke-to-bore) ratios are also shown in this study. After implementation, it was shown that decreasing the coolant temperature in the cylinder head has a greater effect than that of the liner. Furthermore, 4.2 CA and 5 CA of ignition timing advance and 10% and 6.8% of knock load limit expansion were achieved while the coolant temperature was decreased from 85 °C to 60 °C under 1500 rpm and 2000 rpm, respectively. GDI engine also showed knock mitigation effects by the coolant temperature decrease. Higher stroke-to-bore ratio led to expanded load limit due to increased knock suppression. However, there was no significant difference in the effect of coolant temperature decrease for various stroke-to-bore ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207