MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2796054974

Environment and Financial Performance: Case of the Canadian Petroleum Industry

2015· article· en· W2796054974 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hassan El-Ibrami, Paulina Arroyo, Mohamed Hocine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationBusinessCorporate social responsibilityAccountingSample (material)GreenwashingSustainabilityStakeholderFinanceMarketingEconomicsManagementPublic relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Socio-environmental responsibility is at the center of the debate. As a result, companies operating in polluting industries find themselves facing the wall in the face of increased stakeholder demands for compliance with environmental regulations. They are now called upon to make public their socio-environmental actions via their annual financial statements and their sustainable development reports. The socio-environmental performance is thus measurable through the certification systems of which we quote ISO14001 and OHSAS18001. This brings ideas closer to the company and its stakeholders. But the sign and the magnitude of the relationship between socio-environmental and financial performance do not reach consensus among researchers. Our objective is to measure this relationship in the case of companies, socially-environmentally responsible, operating in the Canadian petroleum industry.Our sample consists of 23 certified companies operating in the Canadian oil industry. Of these companies, 17 are not classified as socially responsible by Corporate Knights Magazine, an organization that identifies the top 50 most environmentally responsible companies in Canada. The other six are according to the same instance. In our analysis, we use the ROA as a measure of the financial performance of the companies in our evaluation sample. To measure the effect of certification on financial performance, we consider an evaluation period of 5 years before the first certification of companies and 5 years after this certification. A regression of the ROA after certification on the ROA before certification allows us to measure this relationship. The results show that certification is beneficial for companies in terms of economic spin-offs. This is more pronounced among certified companies but also recognized as being socio-environmentally responsible. Keywords. Certification, IS014001, OHSAS 18001, environmental performance, financial performance, Corporate Knights Magazine, ROA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMining and Resource Management→French-language works237,207→