MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep and Durable Responses in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated with Monotherapy GSK2857916, an Antibody Drug Conjugate Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA): Preliminary Results from Part 2 of Study BMA117159

2017· article· en· W2796115040 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne Trudel, Nikoletta Lendvai, Rakesh Popat, Peter M. Voorhees, Brandi Reeves, Edward N. Libby, Paul G. Richardson, Larry D. Anderson, Heather J. Sutherland, Kwee Yong, Axel Hoos, M Gorczyca, Soumi Lahiri, Zangdong He, Roxanne C. Jewell, Joanna Opalinska, Adam D. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaAntibodyInternal medicinePlasma cell leukemiaPharmacokineticsImmunologyPharmacologyOncologyGastroenterologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background BCMA is a cell surface receptor in the TNF superfamily with expression restricted to B lineage cells at later stages of differentiation, which is required for the survival of long lived plasma cells. BCMA is also expressed on MM cells. GSK2857916 is a humanized IgG1 anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin-F via a stable, protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Upon binding to BCMA, GSK2857916 is rapidly internalized and active drug released in the cell. GSK2857916 also exhibits enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity resulting from afucosylation of the Fc domain, and potentially induces immunogenic cell death. Here we report results from the Part 2 expansion of a Phase 1 study of GSK2857916 in heavily pretreated MM pts. Methods BMA117159 (NCT02064387) is a Phase I, first in human, open-label study investigating GSK2857916 in relapsed/refractory MM and other hematologic malignancies expressing BCMA. The primary objective is safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D); secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK), antidrug antibody (ADA) incidence, and overall response rate (ORR). Dose escalation (Part 1) and expansion (Part 2) in MM pts is complete, and enrollment into a lymphoma cohort is ongoing. GSK2857916 is dosed once every 3 weeks as a 1-hr intravenous infusion, without required prophylaxis for infusion-related reactions (IRR). Eligible MM pts must have been treated with alkylators, proteasome inhibitors (PI), immunomodulators (IMiDs), and stem cell transplantation (if eligible) and must have documented progression on or within 60 days of last therapy. Pts remain on treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or completing 16 treatment cycles. All pts received steroid eye drops for 4 days with each infusion to mitigate corneal events. Results Part 1 results (N=38) were previously presented (Blood, 2016 128:1148); no maximum tolerated dose was identified and the RP2D was determined to be 3.4 mg/kg. Part 2 enrolled 35 MM pts treated at the RP2D: median age is 60 years (range 46-75) and 49% are male. Fifty-seven percent received ≥5 prior lines of therapy (range 1- >10). All pts received and 97% were refractory to PI, all pts received and 91% were refractory to IMiDs, 40% received and 37% were refractory to daratumumab, and 89% were double-refractory to PI and IMiDs. Median number of infusions was 5 (range 1-13) and 54% of pts received ≥5 infusions. The ORR for Part 2 was 60% (21/35; 95% CI 42.1-76.1), including 1 sCR, 2 CR, 15 VGPR, and 3 PR. The ORR in pts previously treated with daratumumab was 43% (6/14; 95% CI 17.7-71.1). Median duration of response was not reached, with a median PFS of 7.9 months (95% CI 3.1- NA). All pts had at least 1 adverse event (AE); the most frequent (≥25%) regardless of cause were corneal events (63%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased (57%), anemia (29%), AST increased (29%), and cough (26%). Corneal events (most frequent ≥20%: vision blurred, dry eye, photophobia) were mostly Grade (Gr) 1/2 and were reversible. Gr 3/4 AEs reported in ≥10% of pts were thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased (34%) and anemia (14%). Serious AEs were reported in 40% (14/35) of pts. With no pre-medication, 8 pts had IRRs (2 Gr 1, 3 Gr 2, 3 Gr 3) that occurred with the first infusion, resolved, and did not recur with subsequent infusions. A total of 18 pts discontinued treatment for disease progression (n=15), AE (n=2; thrombocytopenia, CPK elevation), or pts decision (n=1); 17 pts are ongoing. Conclusion GSK2857916 monotherapy demonstrated encouraging single agent activity with an ORR of 60%, and deep (51% ≥VGPR) and durable responses in heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory MM pts who have limited treatment options. The target and therapeutic mechanisms of action differentiate GSK2857916 from currently approved drugs in MM. Results show a manageable safety profile, with thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased and low grade corneal events being the most frequently reported AEs and most frequent reason for dose modifications. Detailed safety and clinical activity together with results from correlative analyses will be presented. Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline (NCT02064387); drug linker technology is licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody is produced using POTELLIGENT ® Technology licensed from BioWa. Disclosures Trudel: Astellas: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lendvai: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Popat: Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings. Voorhees: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Anderson: Celgene, Takeda, and Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Sutherland: Janssen: Honoraria. Yong: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoos: Imugene: Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gorczyca: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lahiri: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. He: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jewell: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Opalinska: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cohen: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207