Mental health visits and low socio‐economic status in adolescence are associated with complications of Type 1 diabetes in early adulthood: a population‐based cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine the association of mental health visits and socio-economic status in late adolescence with the risk of mortality and acute and chronic diabetes complications in early adulthood. METHODS: birthday, using linked administrative databases (n=8491). The main outcome was death; other outcomes were hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits and chronic diabetes complications (dialysis, ophthalmological and macrovascular complications). RESULTS: Over the course of 59 361 person-years there were 127 deaths.. Low socio-economic status and mental health visits were both associated with a higher risk of death [hazard ratio 2.03, (95% CI 1.13 to 3.64) and 2.45 (95% CI 1.71 to 3.51), respectively]. Those with the lowest socio-economic status and a mental health visit had a higher rate of diabetes-related hospitalizations (rate ratio 4.84, 95% CI 3.64 to 6.44) and emergency department visits (rate ratio 3.15, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.54). Low socio-economic status and mental health visits were both associated with an increased risk of any chronic complication [hazard ratio 1.54 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.96) and 1.57 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.81), respectively]. CONCLUSION: We identified significant socio-economic and mental health disparities in the risk of death and acute and chronic complications in early adulthood for people with childhood-onset diabetes. Targeted interventions to prevent adverse events for these adolescents at highest risk should be evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".