Removing 4E-BP Enables Synapses to Refine without Postsynaptic Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout the developing nervous system, considerable synaptic re-organization takes place as postsynaptic neurons extend dendrites and incoming axons refine their synapses, strengthening some and eliminating others. It is well accepted that these processes rely on synaptic activity; however, the mechanisms that lead to this developmental reorganization are not fully understood. Here, we explore the regulation of cap-dependent translation, a mechanism known to play a role in synaptic growth and plasticity. Using sympathetic ganglia in α3 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR)-knockout (KO) mice, we establish that electrophysiologically silent synapses between preganglionic axons and postsynaptic sympathetic neurons do not refine, and the growth of dendrites and the targeting of synapses on postsynaptic neurons are impaired. Remarkably, genetically removing 4E-BP, a suppressor of cap-dependent translation, from these α3 nAChR-KO mice largely restores these features. We conclude that synaptic connections can re-organize and refine without postsynaptic activity during post-natal development when 4E-BP-regulated cap-dependent translation is enhanced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".