Formation Par et Pour Les Pairs: Jouer Son Role De Passeur Culturel En Milieu Francophone Minoritaire Au Nouveau-Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des pedagogues d’une ecole secondaire de langue francaise au Nouveau-Brunswick ont choisi de s’investir dans une recherche-action qui passe par la planification, l’action, l’observation et la reflexion afin de mieux jouer leur role de passeur culturel. Ils ont egalement cherche a soutenir leurs collegues dans une demarche reflexive commune afin que ceux-ci prennent conscience de leurs actions et interviennent plus efficacement sur la construction identitaire francophone des eleves. Les resultats revelent qu’il a ete gratifiant pour ces praticiens-chercheurs de reflechir et de se mobiliser avec leurs collegues afin de trouver ensemble des solutions pour mieux agir en tant que passeurs culturels. Ils constatent toutefois que le niveau d’engagement varie d’un enseignant a l’autre, et qu’ils manquent de temps et d’outils pour la mise en place de strategies permettant de guider les eleves de facon plus soutenue dans leur construction identitaire, d’ou la necessite de se donner un plan d’action commun.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".