MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796383321

L’adéquation formation-emploi : défi singulier pour le travail atypique. Le secteur culturel comme terrain de mobilisation des connaissances

2017· article· fr· W2796383321 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Mario Chenart

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Réalisé dans le cadre du programme de maîtrise en Pratiques de recherche et action publique de l’INRS – Urbanisation Culture Société, l’essai rend compte à la fois des activités accomplies dans le cadre d’un stage à titre d’agent d’interface en milieu de pratique et des apprentissages réalisés au sein de ce programme de formation. Effectué au Comité sectoriel de main-d’oeuvre en culture (nommé Compétence Culture), le
\nstage avait pour objectifs de : 1)schématiser la portée, pour le secteur culturel, de l’adéquation formation-emploi (AFE) telle que le formule le gouvernement du Québec depuis janvier 2015; 2) puiser à la littérature scientifique des cadres conceptuels qui expliquent la singularité du défi que cette vision de l’AFE pose aux travailleurs atypiques, notamment dans le secteur culturel. L’exercice a constitué une authentique démarche de mobilisation des connaissances du fait qu’il impliquait de : 1) cerner la problématique relative aux effets, dans un secteur où prédomine le travail
\natypique, d’une priorité gouvernementale de formation visant le monde du salariat; 2) sonder l’état des connaissances afférentes; 3) repérer des concepts utiles à la compréhension des enjeux de formation et d’emploi
\nen culture, et propres à guider la réflexion et l’action publique en faveur du
\ncontingent croissant des travailleurs atypiques (38 % de la population active au Québec,
\nen 2013); 4)enfin, traduire ces concepts dans un format qui soit adapté aux besoins des acteurs
\nconcernés en vue de les rendre utiles, utilisables et utilisés.
\nAssorti d’outils de connaissances rapportant les résultats de la recherche en annexes, le
\nprésent essai porte sur l’ensemble de la démarche d’apprentissage, depuis l’acquisition des
\nconnaissances en milieu académique et la préparation du stage jusqu’au choix des produits de
\nconnaissances et des activités de transfert, pour conclure par une réflexion critique sur la
\nmobilisation des connaissances et le rôle d’agent d’interface. <br /><br /> This essay, developed within the context of the Institut national de la recherche scientifique
\n(INRS) Urbanisation Culture Société’s masters program in Research Practices and Public
\nAction, reports on activities accomplished during an internship as interface agent (knowledge
\nbroker) in a practice setting as well as learnings acquired throughout the academic cursus. The
\nobjectives of this internship, performed at the Comité sectoriel de main-d’oeuvre en culture
\n(named Compétence Culture) were: 1) to map the scope, for the cultural sector, of the training and employment adequacy as
\nthe Quebec government defines it since January 2015; 2)to draw conceptual frameworks, derived from scientific literature, which explain the
\nsingular challenge that this vision of the work-training link represents for atypical
\nworkers, particularly within the cultural sector.
\nThis process constituted a genuine knowledge mobilization initiative as it involved:
\n1) defining the problem associated with the effects of a government training priority
\naimed at a wage earners’ model, in a sector in which atypical work predominates; 2) exploring the state of related knowledge; 3) recognizing useful and specific concepts with which to understand the issues
\nregarding training and employment in the cultural sector, and to guide reflection
\nand public action in favor of the growing contingent of atypical workers (in Quebec,
\n38% of the labour force in 2013, ISQ); 4) translating them in a format suited to the needs of the parties involved for the
\npurpose of rendering them useful and usable.
\nIn addition to the appendixes, which include knowledge tools reporting the research results, this
\nessay addresses the learning approach, from the acquisition of knowledge in the academic
\nsetting, the internship preparation, the choice of knowledge tools and transfer activities, to a
\ncritical reflection on knowledge mobilization and the role of interface agent (knowledge broker).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207