Matching drug transcriptional signatures to rare losses disrupting synaptic gene networks identifies known and novel candidate drugs for schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder. The etiology is not fully understood, but genetics plays an important role. Pathway analysis of genetic variants have suggested a central role for neuronal synaptic processes. Currently available antipsychotic medications successfully control positive symptoms (hallucinations and delusions) largely by inhibiting the dopamine D2 receptors; however, these drugs have more limited impact on negative symptoms (social withdrawal, flat affections, anhedonia) and cognitive deterioration. Drug development efforts have focused on a wide range of neurotransmitter systems and other agents, with conflicting or inconclusive results. New drug development paradigms are needed. A recent analysis, using common variant association results to match drugs based on their transcriptional perturbation signature, found drugs enriched in known antipsychotics plus novel candidates. We followed a similar approach, but started our analysis from a synaptic gene network implicated by rare copy number loss variants. We found that a significant number of antipsychotics (p-value = 0.0002) and other psychoactive drugs (p-value = 0.0004) upregulate synaptic network genes. Based on global gene expression similarity, active drugs formed two main clusters: one with many known antipsychotics and antidepressants, the other with various drug categories including two nootropics. We specifically recommend further examination of nootropics with limited side effects ( meclofenoxate , piracetam and vinpocetine ) for combination therapy with antipsychotics to improve cognitive performance. Detailed experimental follow-up is required to further evaluate other candidate drugs lacking an official nervous system indication, although, for at least a few of these, psychoactive effects have been reported in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".