MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796526979 · doi:10.1002/2017gc007266

The Sensitivity of Core Heat Flux to the Modeling of Plate‐Like Surface Motion

2018· article· en· W2796526979 on OpenAlexafffund
S. M. Langemeyer, J. P. Lowman, Paul Tackley

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeat fluxConvectionRheologyMechanicsMantle convectionMantle (geology)GeologyInner coreHeat transferGeophysicsConvective heat transferInternal heatingThermodynamicsTectonicsPhysicsLithosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The generation of a magnetic field and the presence of tectonic plates are fundamental aspects of Earth's evolution. Viable dynamic models of terrestrial mantle convection therefore require the existence of heat transport from the core and a surface characterized by piecewise uniform surface velocity domains (i.e., plates). To test the compatibility of these two requirements, we varied energy input, rheology, and compositional heterogeneity in more than 70 mantle convection simulations. Calculations are performed in a spherical annulus geometry. By systematic investigation, we demonstrate that Earth‐like core heat flux can be obtained with self‐consistent model plates. We find that, given an initial condition where model parameters are chosen to ensure a mobile surface, the mobility is not strongly influenced when H is varied by up to a factor of three. Consequently, in spherical models with steady core temperatures and internal heating rates, the latter quantity can be used to regulate core heat flow to fit within the bounds inferred for terrestrial values. In contrast, core heat flow is strongly sensitive to model yield stress. We systematically vary thermal viscosity contrast, an intrinsic depth‐dependent viscosity and the depth‐dependence of a stress‐dependent rheology and analyze how each factor affects both surface velocities and core heat flux. Finally, we show that the addition of an intrinsically dense component comprising 5% or less of the mantle volume does not affect surface mobility or plateness, although it can have a profound impact on heat loss from the core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207