MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796832087 · doi:10.18016/ksudobil.350489

Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz ve İç Anadolu Bölgeler'inde Görülen Yarı Parazit Bitki Türlerin Konakları ve Simptomlarının Araştırılması

2018· article· tr· W2796832087 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamer Üstüner

Bibliographic record

VenueKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi · 2018
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscum albumBotanyBiologySubspeciesHost (biology)Pyrus communisParasitic plantPEARHorticultureForestryGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was carried out to determine the symptoms and hosts of the semi parasitic plant species causing problems on the forest and fruit trees in the East Mediterranean (Kahramanmaras) and Central Anatolia region ( Nigde) in 2012-2016. When these semi parasitic plants appear on the plants, they can cause swelling at the germinated sites of branches of their host and resulting backward tissue drying. It has also been observed to cause the host to die completely in some host such as almonds and apricot. The study was conducted in Nigde, through the Mistletoe survey performed on some fruit and park trees and the results indicated that a subspecies of semi parasitic. Viscum album naming Viscum album ssp. album was living on these trees . The whitethorn, wild pear, Ankara pear, almond, Braeburn apple, plum, apricot, sour cherry, locust, Canada poplar and willow were found to be the host for Viscum album ssp. album. Other mistletoe species; Viscum album ssp. abietis was seen on Taurus fir and Taurus cedar while Viscum album subsp. austriacum on Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa DergisiSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207