MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796843092 · doi:10.1063/1.5011424

Phosphorus oxide gate dielectric for black phosphorus field effect transistors

2018· article· en· W2796843092 on OpenAlexafffund
William Dickerson, V. Tayari, Ibrahim Fakih, Andreas Korinek, Maria Caporali, Manuel Serrano‐Ruiz, Maurizio Peruzzini, Stefan Heun, Gianluigi A. Botton, Thomas Szkopek

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH2020 European Research CouncilScuola Normale Superiore
KeywordsPassivationMaterials scienceGate dielectricLayer (electronics)Atomic layer depositionReactive-ion etchingOptoelectronicsFabricationEtching (microfabrication)DielectricPhosphorusField-effect transistorOxidePhotoluminescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryTransistorNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgyEnvironmental chemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The environmental stability of the layered semiconductor black phosphorus (bP) remains a challenge. Passivation of the bP surface with phosphorus oxide, POx, grown by a reactive ion etch with oxygen plasma is known to improve photoluminescence efficiency of exfoliated bP flakes. We apply phosphorus oxide passivation in the fabrication of bP field effect transistors using a gate stack consisting of a POx layer grown by reactive ion etching followed by atomic layer deposition of Al2O3. We observe room temperature top-gate mobilities of 115 cm2 V−1 s−1 in ambient conditions, which we attribute to the low defect density of the bP/POx interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207