Molecular Dynamics Study of the Role of Water in the Carbon Dioxide Intercalation in Chloride Ions Bearing Hydrotalcite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulation was used to study the role of water in the intercalation of CO 2 with a model Mg–Al–Cl-hydrotalcite mineral at ambient pressure and temperature. The ClayFF force field was used along with a model Mg–Al–Cl-hydrotalcite containing different amounts of water (H 2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) molecules in its interlayer spacing. It was observed that high CO 2 content, say 3.85 mmol g –1, could be achieved at low water concentrations or even without the presence of water. However, high water concentrations (e.g., 2 H 2 O molecules/hydrotalcite unit cell, the maximum allowed water concentration observed experimentally) could also yield similar CO 2 content, but in this case, the presence of water led to a significant interlayer spacing expansion (from 23.0 Å (no water) to 28.5 Å). The expansion was likely due to the change in the orientation distribution of the CO 2 molecules. Analyzing the orientation of CO 2 molecules revealed that they preferred to orientate parallel to the mineral surface at low water concentrations. However, as water concentration increased, CO 2 molecules exhibited a wider range of orientations with a significant fraction of them orienting more or less perpendicular to the mineral surface, especially at high CO 2 contents. The observed change in the orientation of CO 2 was attributed to the dipole interaction between H 2 O and CO 2 molecules and the reduced interaction between CO 2 and the hydroxyl groups on hydrotalcite. Also, it was observed that water molecules formed extensive hydrogen bond networks. All of the above findings seem to explain the contradicting results reported in the literature that water is needed under certain conditions to increase the amount of CO 2 captured by hydrotalcites. Here, we showed that high amounts of CO 2 can be intercalated with the presence of water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".