MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797092229 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/iry006.083

80 Admission Creatinine is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Burn Patients

2018· article· en· W2797092229 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Rehou, Mile Stanojcic, Marc G. Jeschke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatinineMedicineTotal body surface areaAcute kidney injuryRenal functionInternal medicineLogistic regressionBlood urea nitrogenSurgeryUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common occurrence in severely burned patients. However, definitions and protocols vary and therefore the impact of AKI is not well known. The most utilized clinical biomarkers are creatinine and blood urea nitrogen. The purpose of this study was to determine if admission serum creatinine is associated with mortality and other organ dysfunction. We hypothesized that a high admission creatinine is associated with adverse outcomes. We conducted a cohort study of adult patients admitted from 2006 to 2016 to a regional burn centre. Patients were included if they had a burn ≥ 5% total body surface area (TBSA) and a serum creatinine level measured within the first 72 hours post-injury. Patients were divided into two groups based on serum creatinine levels measured within the first 72 hours post-injury. Patients categorized in the high creatinine group if they had a measured creatinine > 106 μmol/L (>1.2 mg/dL); this value was chosen as the flag for “high” creatinine from our institution’s reference range. Clinical outcomes included morbidities, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between high admission creatinine and each outcome, adjusting for patient and injury characteristics. We studied 923 patients, mean age 47 ± 18 years and median 13% (IQR 8–24) TBSA burned. There were 718 patients categorized with low admission creatinine and 205 patients with high admission creatinine. Patients in the high admission creatinine group had significantly greater percent TBSA burn, and a significantly greater proportion of patients with inhalation injury, complications, and mortality (p<0.05). After adjustment for patient and injury characteristics, high admission creatinine was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.88–7.21), pneumonia (OR 3.36; 95% CI 1.29–8.74), and sepsis (OR 3.32; 95% CI 2.02–5.47). Elevated creatinine on admission is associated with an increased risk of morality and inpatient complications. Renal function is influenced during the initial acute resuscitation period by adequate fluid titration; however, renal function of patients with a high admission creatinine level might be overwhelmed by added effects of injury. Future studies are needed to determine if early initiation of renal replacement therapy improves outcomes. Providers should be aware of increased morbidity and mortality in this cohort to optimize care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207