MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797240921 · doi:10.7939/r36d5pk14

Ethanol Production from Hybrid Poplar in Canada: A General Equilibrium Analysis

2015· article· en· W2797240921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hawley Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)MathematicsEconomicsPulp and paper industryMathematical economicsEnvironmental scienceMicroeconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethanol has been promoted in Canada as an alternative to fossil fuels in the transportation sector. Future changes in Canada’s emerging bioeconomy have the potential to cross industry boundaries, such as agricultural and forestry, and lead to inadvertent economic outcomes. As biofuel production technology develops, further production could come from first-generation grain-based feedstocks, or second-generation cellulosic feedstocks. This study evaluates potential economic impacts due to renewable fuel standards that double current ethanol production from first-generation ethanol, versus cellulosic ethanol produced from hybrid poplar feedstock in Canada. We also investigate the effect of current legislation restricting hybrid poplar growth on crown forestland. Finally, we consider impacts from increased crop productivity and oil prices on our simulated economic outcomes. Impacts are investigated in a general equilibrium economic framework. Overall, we find that doubling ethanol production in Canada results in price and output changes between 0% and 10%, with percentages generally higher in agricultural sectors than in forestry. Results further suggest that cellulosic ethanol leads to relatively lower inter-industry price and output impacts compared to first-generation ethanol, due to the availability of marginal land for hybrid poplar production. For both first-generation and cellulosic ethanol, estimated impacts to Canadian net exports can be substantial for some agricultural sectors. We find that the use of coarse grains for increased first-generation ethanol production leads to an approximately 21% decrease in coarse grain net exports, while increased production with cellulosic ethanol has a relatively larger impact on ruminant trade, with net exports decreasing between 27 – 34%. Results also indicate that the subsidy support required to double current ethanol is costly, at around USD 3.00/gallon. Sensitivity analysis suggests that a crop productivity increase leads to relatively larger benefits to first-generation ethanol, while a 10% oil price increase can double Canadian ethanol production, even without further government support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207