Imidazolines increase the levels of the autophagosomal marker LC3-II in macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated whether imidazolines can induce autophagy in the murine macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7. Idazoxan increased the content of LC3-II, an autophagosomal marker, in RAW264.7 cells. To determine whether this effect was due to the induction of its synthesis or inhibition of its degradation, idazoxan treatment was performed in the presence of bafilomycin A1, which blocks autophagosome-lysosome fusion, as well as Pepstatin A and E-64d, both of which block protein degradation in autolysosomes. An increased content of LC3-II was observed in the presence of bafilomycin A1 as well as the protease inhibitors. Furthermore, an increased number of autophagosomes was observed following idazoxan treatment using an autophagosome-specific dye. This indicated that idazoxan induced autophagy. Other imidazolines, such as efaroxan, clonidine, and 2-(2-benzofuranyl)-2-imidazoline, also increased the LC3-II content in RAW264.7 cells in the presence of bafilomycin A1. Taken together, these results indicate that some imidazolines, including idazoxan, can induce autophagy in RAW264.7 cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".