Spectral and Energy Efficiency Tradeoff for Massive MIMO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Achieving a good tradeoff between spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) is important for the emerging wireless communication systems. Motivated by this, we study multiuser downlink beamforming in massive multiple-input multiple-output systems for maximizing a new metric of resource efficiency (RE), which is defined as a weighted combination of EE and SE. The new measure has more flexibility in striking the balance between SE and EE, but brings enormous difficulties in solving the resulting problem. To this end, we first investigate an uplink-downlink duality for the RE maximization. The conventional uplink-downlink duality only applies in the SE or the capacity region, and has yet not been explicitly established for the EE or the RE. In this paper, we prove with rigorous derivation that the duality has a more general form, which can be directly used to tackle the EE or RE beamforming optimization problem. Based on the duality, we then develop an optimization algorithm to realize spectral and energy efficient multiuser beamforming with either instantaneous or statistical channel state information (CSI). Numerical results finally verify that the design based on statistical CSI is able to asymptotically achieve the performance obtained with instantaneous CSI, but with much lower complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".