MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797390801 · doi:10.1161/jaha.117.008139

Hypertriglyceridemic Waist: A Simple Marker of High‐Risk Atherosclerosis Features Associated With Excess Visceral Adiposity/Ectopic Fat

2018· article· en· W2797390801 on OpenAlexafffund
Stéphanie LeBlanc, François Coulombe, Olivier F. Bertrand, Karine Bibeau, Philippe Pîbarot, André Marette, Natalie Alméras, Isabelle Lemieux, Jean‐Pierre Després, Éric Larose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineWaistInternal medicineCardiologyBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Subclinical atherosclerosis identification remains challenging; abdominal visceral adiposity may improve risk stratification beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertriglyceridemic waist, a visceral adiposity marker combining elevated triglycerides (≥2 mmol/L) and waist circumference (≥90 cm), has been related to carotid atherosclerosis, although associations with high‐risk features, including lipid‐rich necrotic core (LRNC), remain unknown. We tested the hypothesis that hypertriglyceridemic waist is an independent marker of high‐risk atherosclerosis features. Methods and Results In this cross‐sectional study including 467 white men (mean age, 45.9±14.8 years; range 19.4–77.6 years), carotid atherosclerosis characteristics were examined by magnetic resonance imaging and associations with hypertriglyceridemic waist and benefits beyond Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) were determined. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis was present in 61.9% of participants, whereas 50.1% had LRNC. Hypertriglyceridemic waist was associated with carotid maximum wall thickness ( P =0.014), wall volume ( P =0.025), normalized wall index ( P =0.004), and Carotid Atherosclerosis Score (derived from wall thickness and LRNC; P =0.049). Hypertriglyceridemic waist was associated with carotid LRNC volume beyond FRS ( P =0.037) or PDAY ( P =0.015), contrary to waist circumference alone (both P >0.05). Although 69.7% and 62.0% of participants with carotid atherosclerosis and/or LRNC were not high‐risk by FRS or PDAY, respectively, hypertriglyceridemic waist correctly reclassified 9.7% and 4.5% of them, respectively. Combining hypertriglyceridemic waist with FRS (net reclassification improvement=0.17; P <0.001) or PDAY (net reclassification improvement=0.05; P =0.003) was superior to each score alone in identifying individuals with carotid atherosclerosis and/or LRNC. Conclusions Hypertriglyceridemic waist is an independent marker of carotid high‐risk atherosclerosis features in men, improving on FRS and PDAY risk score.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207