Abstract 13974: Loss of Endothelial Primary Cilia Promotes Thrombus Formation in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Recent evidence suggest that endothelial cilia may suppress anti-inflammatory signaling and protect against atherosclerosis. Given that atherosclerosis predisposes to thrombosis, we hypothesized that endothelial cilia may also play a fundamental role in thrombogenesis. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that endothelial cilia is important for protection against thrombosis, and that loss of endothelial cilia promotes thrombus formation in mice. Methods: We focused on the intraflagellar transport 88 (IFT88) gene since endothelial deletion of IFT88 has been associated with decreased atherosclerotic lesions in a murine model of atherosclerosis. Key thrombosis-associated molecules were evaluated in IFT88-silenced human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Thrombi formation were monitored in the laser-injured cremasteric arteries of 8 week old male endothelial cell (EC) specific IFT88 knockout (EC-IFT88 -/- ) mice. Results: Compared to scrambled siRNA-treated HUVECs, those exposed to siIFT88 exhibited lower mRNA and protein levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and thrombomodulin, two key regulators of blood coagulation (-27% and -20%, respectively; N=3; p < 0.05). We next examined the effect of IFT88 loss on thrombosis in mice. Upon laser-induced injury, we determined, via mean fluorescence intensity, that although the thrombi formed in the cremasteric arteries of EC-IFT88 -/- mice were similar in size to those produced in the wild type (WT) mice (2.2 ± 0.6 and 2.0 ± 0.3 AU, respectively; x10 6 ; N=32 thrombi; p=0.8), the average rate at which thrombi developed was significantly faster in the EC-IFT88 -/- mice relative to that in WT mice (97 ± 11 and 57 ± 3 AU/s, respectively; N=32 thrombi; p<0.001). Conclusions: Loss of endothelial IFT88 results in decreased TFPI mRNA and protein expression in HUVECs. EC-IFT88 -/- mice exhibited earlier thrombi formation in our laser injury model of thrombosis. These results collectively suggest that endothelial cilia intricately regulates thrombus formation in a TFPI-dependent manner and represents a previously unrecognized target to modulate thrombosis susceptibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".