MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797687910 · doi:10.22037/bhl.v1i3.19038

Role of Organizational Culture and Implementing the Critical Success Factors Resulting in Reduced Medical Errors from the Viewpoint of Nurses

2017· article· en· W2797687910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Morteza Ghasemi, Hosein Jarahi

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth law journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDescriptive statisticsPsychologyConfidentialityOrganizational cultureTest (biology)BachelorHealth careReliability (semiconductor)NursingMedical educationApplied psychologyMedicineStatisticsPublic relationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim : A set of management practices called critical success factors and organizational culture can lead to a misplaced program for reaching a goal in the hospital. The incidence of medical errors, one of the most important issues influenced by multiple factors, undermines the quality of healthcare provision and satisfaction and increases costs. Considering that medical errors constitute 44,000-98,000 of the annual deaths in the United States and the lack of reliable statistics in Iran, we aimed to examine the roles of organizational culture and critical success factors in reducing medical errors. Materials and Methods : This applied cross-sectional study was performed among the staff of hospitals affiliated to Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. A 44-item questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire was designed based on the studies by McFadden, Cameron and Quinn, and Gowen and Tallon, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed in this study. Descriptive (frequency distribution) and inferential statistics (ANOVA, two-sample-t-test, and linear regression) were employed to analyze the data in SPSS, version. Ethical Considerations : The informed consent was obtained from participants after explaining the research aims and the participants assured about the confidentiality of information. Findings : Most of the respondents were women (58.1%) and within the 30-40 years age group (52.5%). Further, 50.4% of the participants had a Bachelor’s degree. Two main hypotheses and 10 sub-hypotheses were tested and partially accepted. Our results suggested that staff participation, error report, cultural change, education and training, statistical reports, system redesign, collaborative culture, hierarchical culture, mission culture, compatibility culture, and implementation of critical success factors can contribute to reducing errors. Conclusion : Hospital managers must try to encourage the development and maintenance of a culture that emphasizes on interpersonal relationships, development of human resources, mentoring co-workers, teamwork and participation, trust, and commitment. To this end, hospital managers should recognize the role of organizational maturity in reducing medical errors and encourage employees to develop organizational culture and increase organizational maturity. Citation:  Ghasemi M, Jarahi H. Role of Organizational Culture and Implementing the Critical Success Factors Resulting in Reduced Medical Errors from the Viewpoint of Nurses. Bioeth Health Law J. 2017; 1(3):19-26.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.441 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth law journalSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207