MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797794161 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/iry006.212

290 Pediatric Frostbite: A 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study

2018· article· en· W2797794161 on OpenAlexaff
Ramy Boles, Justin Gawaziuk, Nora Cristall, Sarvesh Logsetty

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFrostbiteBurn centerRetrospective cohort studyInjury preventionPoison controlBurn injuryPopulationDemographicsTrauma centerEmergency medicinePediatricsSurgeryDemographyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frostbite is a thermal injury from frozen tissue. Literature is limited on children, a vulnerable population not in control of their environment. The objective is to describe frostbite in children referred to a regional pediatric hospital and intrinsic (psychological and behavioral) and extrinsic (meteorological and safety hazard) factors related to the injury. Retrospective chart review of 47 patients < 18 years old examining demographics, and intrinsic and extrinsic factors related to injuries. Demographic characteristics included sex, with whom the child lives with, illicit drug use, physical comorbidities, and region of residence. Injury characteristics included anatomical location, management, ambient temperature at the time of injury, exposure duration, injury circumstance, and factors related to injury including intoxication and supervision. Summary statistics are presented as median (IQR) or number (%) unless otherwise noted. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine normality. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in median ambient temperature or median exposure duration between groups that had one or more procedures compared to none. Statistically significant differences between groups were defined as p < 0.05. Median age was 15 years (IQR 12–16) and 49% were admitted. Frequently documented risk activities included use of alcohol (53%), cigarettes (34%), marijuana (23%), and symptoms of depression and/or suicidality (32%). Although frostbite starts to present at ≤ -6°C, procedures were only required for frostbite occurring at temperatures ≤ -23°C (p = .001). Along with colder ambient temperature, long exposure duration (p < .001) was significantly related to likelihood of procedure, as opposed to conservative wound management. Two factors related to the injury were identified: intoxication and lack of supervision. Among patients 0–12 years, lack of supervision at time of injury was common (64%), while intoxication among older patients ages 13–17 was common (61%). To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of pediatric frostbite. These findings call for targeted outreach to reduce frostbite incidence. For younger children, the focus must be on involving and educating parents on risks of unsupervised care. For older children, informing youth on risks of frostbite alongside approaches to curb adolescent alcohol use are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207