Milhaud-Cappe Danielle. Freud et le Mouvement de Pédagogie psychanalytique, 1908-1937 : A. Aichhorn, H. Zulliger, O. Pfister
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre les annes 1908 et 1937, paralllement au dveloppement de l'oeuvre de Freud, des ducateurs, des enseignants, des psychanalystes, des thrapeutes, veulent contribuer l'laboration d'hypothses et de pratiques pdagogiques qui fondent une pdagogie nouvelle, bnficiant de l'apport de la psychanalyse, se voulant d'orientation psychanalytique. C'est ainsi qu'en rapport les uns avec les autres, mais selon les cas avec Freud lui-mme, Oskar Pfister, Pierre Bovet, Hans Zullinger, August Aichhorn, Sigfried Bernfeld, en Autriche ou en Suisse, pratiquent et participent la thorisation d'une pdagogie psychanalytique fonde sur les travaux de Freud. En 1925, Heinrich Meng, psychanalyste, et Ernst Schneider, psycho-pdagogue, fondent la Revue pour une pdagogie psychanalytique qui, en onze annes d'existence, publiera plus de deux cent articles concernant des problmes d'ducation, concrtisant les espoirs mis dans l'ouverture de l'ducation la psychanalyse. L'volution de ladite pdagogie psychanalytique, et la question mme de l' application de la psychanalyse
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".