MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798076961 · doi:10.7939/r35m62d7g

Porosity and permeability in the Graminia Formation, Upper Devonian Winterburn Group in the Germain Field, northeastern Alberta

2014· article· en· W2798076961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meghan E Black

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianGeologyGroup (periodic table)Permeability (electromagnetism)GeochemistryPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Upper Devonian Graminia Formation (Winterburn Group) found in the Germain Field of northeastern Alberta includes the Blueridge Member (Frasnian) and the Upper Graminia Member (Famennian). A green silty-shale paleosol overlies the formation in this area. The bitumen-bearing dolostones of this formation are divided into Facies A, B, C, D, E, and F based on mineralogy, fabric, and cement types. Facies A, B, C, and E are formed of very finely to finely crystalline dolomitic siltstones to silty dolostones that are variably cemented with calcite and dolomite. Facies D is a green silty-shale bed that lies between Facies C and E. Facies F is a powdered dolomite cemented with bitumen. The sediments of the Blueridge Member were deposited during a third order regression in an inner-ramp setting. The sediments of the Upper Graminia Member were deposited during a fall in sea level that caused the ramp to shallow into the peritidal to supratidal zone. The precise timing and formation of dolomite is not known, but is thought to be sabhka-related based on the depositional framework. Facies F (powdered dolomite) may have been produced by diagenetic changes associated with a period of karst/exposure. Porosity values range from 3 to 40% and average permeability values range from 5 to 450 md. The main types of porosity are intergranular/intercrystalline (very common), vuggy (common) and fracture (rare). The permeability is controlled by the intergranular/intercrystalline pores and fractures. The porosity and permeability values do not display any predictable patterns across the Germain Field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207