Estrogen receptor regulates hormone-induced growth arrest in a luminal A like breast cancer model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer has been divided into two subtypes, luminal A and luminal B, which differ in their ER expression and response to hormone therapy. The absence of luminal A cell lines means the extensive amount of in vitro work studying the response to hormones in ER+ breast cancers is biased for the luminal B subtype. We have developed a luminal A like cell model by increasing the ER expression in the MCF-7 cell line. Our results show that increased ER expression promotes an anti-proliferative response to estrogen through regulation of genes involved in the G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle. Furthermore, increased ER expression increases ER-DNA binding in the absence of estrogen and regulates basal gene transcription by promoting DNA looping. These results provide novel evidence that the characteristic increased ER expression of luminal A tumors may promote a novel chromatin configuration that enables growth of these tumors in the absence of estrogen and enables gene repression in the presence of hormones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".