MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798950335 · doi:10.1109/cpre.2018.8349811

New methods for monitoring neutral grounding resistors

2018· article· en· W2798950335 on OpenAlexaff
Rahim Jafari, Mital Kanabar, Ilia Voloh, T.S. Sidhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorGroundElectrical engineeringRelayEngineeringArc suppressionGenerator (circuit theory)VoltageElectronic engineeringElectric power systemComputer sciencePower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical power systems control arcing current and electrical shock hazard by proper neutral grounding such as high resistance grounding. The high resistance neutral grounding resistors fail due to vibration, intermittent arcs, corrosion, etc. and cause the risk of the system being ungrounded, or solidly grounded. In this paper, two efficient solutions are introduced that provide continuous monitoring of such resistors installed at neutral of two most common configurations of the unit-connected generators. The first proposed method relies on the third harmonic of neutral and residual voltages, and the second technique employs the sub-harmonic injection based generator stator ground protection. The proposed methods show satisfying performance under different conditions of the resistor and generator, observed through comprehensive software analysis and further hardware validations. The first proposed monitoring method has been retrofitted to an industrial generator protection relay which no longer maloperates due to failed-short neutral grounding resistor. Proposed techniques can be incorporated into digital protective relays, which will monitor and alarm in case of the failed grounding resistor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrical Fault Detection and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207