MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

e28 Audit of the need and access to dental services in inflammatory arthritis patients

2018· article· en· W2799541827 on OpenAlexaff
Zoe Rutter‐Locher, Nidhi Sofat

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAuditInflammatory arthritisArthritisIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Inflammatory arthritides are chronic conditions which require a multi-disciplinary team approach to management. Rheumatoid arthritis is characterised by flares of joint pain, stiffness and fatigue and can progress to joint deformity and disability. This can affect an individual’s ability both to perform everyday dental hygiene tasks and their ability to access dental services. Previous studies have found an association between gum disease and inflammatory arthritis, specifically rheumatoid arthritis. It is therefore important that patients with inflammatory arthritis have easy access to dental care and information on good dental hygiene. This audit aimed to assess the need and use of dental services in patients with inflammatory arthritis in an inner city tertiary hospital outpatient clinic setting. Methods: Patients with inflammatory arthritis who presented to general rheumatology outpatients over a period of 3 months, were asked to complete a questionnaire. Data was then analysed using excel. Results: 35 participants completed the questionnaire. F: M ratio was 7.75:1 and mean age was 51.8 (Range 24-84). 57% patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 15% had spondyloarthropathy, 14% had psoriatic arthritis, 11% had systemic lupus erythematosus and 3% had juvenile polyarthritis. There was a high prevalence of symptoms of gum disease with 29% reporting a previous gum infection, 31% reporting their gums bled recently, 40% reporting they could see more of the roots of their teeth than in the past, 23% reporting red gums and 23% reporting missing teeth (excluding wisdom teeth). 89% patients were registered with a dentist. 74% patients had been reviewed by a dentist in the last year. 80% patients brushed their teeth at least twice a day. However, only 49% flossed at least once a day and only 40% used mouthwash at least once a day. Four of the 35 patients were awaiting treatment, two of these stated they could not undergo it due to cost constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207