Molecular engineering of logic gate types by module rearrangement in ‘Pourbaix Sensors’: the effect of excited-state electric fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two types of fluorescent logic gates are accessed from two different arrangements of the same modular components, one as an AND logic gate (1) and the other as a PASS 0 logic gate (2). The logic gates were designed with an 'electron-donor-spacer1-fluorophore-spacer2-receptor' format and demonstrated in 1 : 1 (v/v) methanol/water. The molecules consist of ferrocene as the electron donor, 4-aminonaphthalimide as the fluorophore and a tertiary alkylamine as the receptor. In the presence of high H+ and Fe3+ levels, regioisomers 1a and 1b switch 'on' as AND logic gates with fluorescence enhancement ratios of 16-fold and 10-fold, respectively, while regioisomers 2a and 2b are functionally dormant, exhibiting no fluorescence switching. The PASS 0 logic of 2a and 2b results from the transfer of an electron from the excited state fluorophore to the ferrocenium unit under oxidising conditions as predicted by DFT calculations. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy provided lifetimes of 8.3 ns and 8.1 ns for 1a and 1b, respectively. The transient signal recovery rate of 1b is ∼10 ps while that of 2b is considerably longer on the nanosecond timescale. The divergent logic attributes of 1 and 2 highlight the importance of field effects and opens up a new approach for regulating logic-based molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".