MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799597887 · doi:10.7939/r3g737j0t

Oribatid mite communities after ecosystem disturbance in Alberta

2017· article· en· W2799597887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brittany N. McAdams

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisturbance (geology)EcosystemEcologyGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many northern Alberta soils have a thick forest floor that houses the majority of soil biogeochemical processes and biological interactions. Microarthropods dominate the faunal communities in these soils, and oribatid mites are the key detritivores that initiate litter decomposition and maintain forest floor structure. Soil disturbance is becoming more prevalent across Alberta and may threaten the long-term sustainability of the forest floor as both a nutrient reservoir and a habitat for oribatid mite communities. The objective of this research was to characterize oribatid mite abundance, richness, diversity, and species composition after two growing sources of soil disturbance in Alberta: oil sands mining and non-native earthworm invasion. Bitumen extraction in the Athabasca oil sands region has disrupted over 800 km2 of boreal forest habitat to date, forcing soils to be reconstructed from the ground up. The specific objectives following soil reconstruction were to identify: i) which overstory vegetation may favor mite recovery, and ii) at what point in time would mite communities begin to resemble mite communities in natural stands. A chronosequence of 15 reclaimed soils was sampled to assess the influence of canopy (aspen or white spruce) and time-since-reclamation (8-31 yrs.) on oribatid mite communities, and was compared to five undisturbed soils. Species-level identification revealed that the presence of a novel forest floor at sites undergoing reclamation had the biggest impact on oribatid mite reestablishment. Reclaimed stands with a novel forest floor thickness 2 cm had similar oribatid mite species richness and diversity to that of undisturbed stands and at times had higher abundances than undisturbed stands regardless of time since reclamation or stand type. Compared to soil reconstruction, non-native earthworm invasion is a less drastic disturbance. However, the presence of another keystone detritivore may threaten the stability of endemic oribatid mite communities in northern boreal forest floors. The objectives following non-native earthworm invasion were to: i) characterize earthworm and oribatid mite assemblage present in a boreal aspen stand and ii) assess how oribatid mite assemblages respond to changes in soil biogeochemical properties as a result of earthworm disturbance. An invaded aspen stand near Wolf Lake, Alberta was surveyed for earthworm invasion and divided into two areas representing different invasion stages: (1) a low density, single species invasion area (Dendrobaena octaedra only), and (2) a high density, multiple species invasion area (Dendrobaena octaedra and Aporrectodea spp.). At each area, oribatid mite communities were sampled. The high density invasion area had a higher forest floor bulk density and a thinner leaf litter. As a result, a drastic loss of the mite species Gymnodamaeus ornatus was observed and overall species richness decreased in the high density invasion area. Ultimately, it was the physical loss of and/or alteration of the forest floor habitat that was the main driver of oribatid mite community response to soil disturbance in both studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207