MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799630289 · doi:10.3382/ps/pey140

The use of a live non-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine modifies Eimeria spp. excretion in commercial antibiotic-free broiler chicken flocks compared to conventional shuttle anticoccidial programs

2018· article· en· W2799630289 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Parent, Dorine Fernandez, Martine Boulianne

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCoccidia and coccidiosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlockBroilerCoccidiosisEimeriaAnimal scienceExcretionVeterinary medicineStarterFecesAttenuated vaccineBiologyFeed conversion ratioMedicineFood scienceBody weightMicrobiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives were to compare the effects of an antibiotic-free (ABF) program in commercial broiler chicken flocks using a live non-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine on fecal Eimeria spp. excretion and growth performances with those of conventionally raised commercial broiler chicken flocks. Fecal samples were collected every 3 d from 7 d of age to slaughter in 44 flocks of 7 participating farms for oocyst counts by the McMaster method. A live non-attenuated anticoccidial vaccine was administered by spray cabinet at the hatchery in ABF flocks only. Shuttle programs in conventional flocks consisted of in-feed chemical anticoccidials from 0 to 20 d of age, followed by polyether ionophores until slaughter. In-feed antibiotic growth promoters were included from the starter to finisher diets in conventional flocks only. Age of the flock at the oocyst excretion peak (AGE_PEAK) and the number of oocysts at that excretion peak (OPG_PEAK) were recorded. There was a significant difference of 2.7 d (P = 0.0001) for the AGE_PEAK, from 26.4 d in the conventional treatment to 23.7 d in the ABF program. There was no significant difference for the OPG_PEAK between the 2 treatments (P = 0.626). There was a significant decrease of 2.28 g in the average daily gain (P = 0.004) and increase of 0.08 for the feed conversion ratio (P < 0.0001) in the ABF program compared to the conventional program. There were no significant differences for body weights at slaughter (P = 0.0563), livability (P = 0.2694), and condemnations (P = 0.6775). From this study, it can be concluded that an ABF program using a live non-attenuated vaccine will show an earlier oocyst excretion peak compared to a shuttle program, but no significant effect was observed on the total number of oocysts at that excretion peak between the 2 programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicCoccidia and coccidiosis researchFrench-language works237,207