MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799679566 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00273

Impact of Lesion Load Thresholds on Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

2018· article· en· W2799679566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julian Schröder, Bastian Cheng, Caroline Malherbe, Martin Ebinger, Martin Köhrmann, Ona Wu, Dong‐Wha Kang, David S. Liebeskind, Thomas Tourdias, Oliver C. Singer, Bruce Campbell, Marie Luby, Steven Warach, Jens Fiehler, André Kemmling, Jochen B. Fiebach, Christian Gerloff, Götz Thomalla

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilDell Medical School, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesCenter for Stroke Research BerlinNational Health and Medical Research CouncilElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Stroke FoundationEuropean CommissionVolkswagen Foundation
KeywordsMedicineVoxelDiffusion MRIStroke (engine)RadiologyLesionMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingNuclear medicineSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Assessment of ischemic lesions on CT or MRI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is widely used to guide acute stroke treatment. However, it has never been defined how many voxels need to be affected to label an DWI-ASPECTS region ischemic. We aimed to assess the effect of various lesion load thresholds on DWI-ASPECTS and compare this automated analysis with visual rating. Materials and Methods: We analyzed overlap of individual DWI lesions of 315 patients from the previously published PRE-FLAIR study with a probabilistic ASPECTS template derived from 221 CT images. We applied multiple lesion load thresholds per DWI-ASPECTS region (>0, >1%, >10%, >20% in each DWI-ASPECTS region) to compute DWI-ASPECTS for each patient and compared the results to visual reading by an experienced stroke neurologist. Results: By visual rating, median ASPECTS was 9, 84 patients had an DWI-ASPECTS score ≤7. Mean DWI lesion volume was 22.1 (±35) ml. In contrast, by use of >0, >1%-, >10%-, and >20%-thresholds, median DWI-ASPECTS was 1, 5, 8 and 10; 97.1% (306), 72.7% (229), 41% (129) and 25.7% (81) had DWI-ASPECTS ≤7, respectively. Overall agreement between automated assessment and visual rating was low for every threshold used (>0%: κw=0.020 1%: κw=0.151; 10%: κw=0.386; 20% κw=0.381). Agreement for dichotomized DWI-ASPECTS ranged from fair to substantial (≤7: >10% κ=0.48; >20% κ=0.45; ≤5: >10% κ=0.528; >20% κ=0.695). Conclusion: Overall agreement between automated and the standardly used visual scoring is low regardless of the lesion load threshold used. However, dichotomized scoring achieved more comparable results. Varying lesion load thresholds had a critical impact on patient selection by ASPECTS. Of note, the relatively low lesion volume and lack of patients with large artery occlusion in our cohort may limit generalizability of these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207