MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799679680 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2016-0038

TOOLING DESIGN IMPROVEMENT OF MULTISTAGE COLD FORGING OF SPECIALTY SHAPED NUTS USING CAE AND 3D PRINTING

2016· article· en· W2799679680 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shao‐Yi Hsia, Yu-Tuan Chou

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgingManufacturing engineeringFastenerAutomotive industryEngineeringMechanical engineeringSoftwareScheduleProcess (computing)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given its critical role in the fastener industry, cold forging is widely performed in automotive production, manufacturing, aviation, and 3C products. Personnel experience and trying error approaches provide a subjective and unreliable background despite their extensive use in fastener forming and die design owing to the difficulty in controlling the development schedule. This study used DEFORM-3D analysis software to investigate the die service life from producing specialty shaped nuts in a multistage cold forging process. Effective stress, effective strain, velocity field, and other quantitative metrics of dies and work-pieces can be obtained from numerical simulations. Herein, 3D printing technology is also implemented to create cold forging dies and deformed work-pieces for assessing the dimension of tooling assembly. This process allows engineers to gain a better understanding of the tooling design at development phase and derives the parts, which were previously just simulation results from DEFORM-3D forming software. Results can help a multistage processing factory establish a cold forming capacity for the development of new products. Consequently, the ability of self-design and self-manufacture of specialty shaped fasteners in Taiwan could be increased widely to enhance the international competitiveness of domestic industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207