Application of Diazaphospholidine/Diazaphospholene-Based Bisphosphines in Room-Temperature Nickel-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–N Cross-Couplings of Primary Alkylamines with (Hetero)aryl Chlorides and Bromides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report herein on the synthesis and catalytic application of a family of o -phenylene-bridged bisphosphine ancillary ligands featuring a bulky N-heterocyclic phosphine (NHP) donor fragment paired with an adjacent PR 2 donor group (R = alkyl, aryl), whereby the incorporation of phosphorus into either a saturated or unsaturated heterocyclic ring serves as a means of modulating the donicity of the NHP fragment. Screening of these ancillary ligands in representative nickel-catalyzed C(sp 2 )–N cross-coupling test reactions allowed for the identification of one variant, featuring a saturated NHP structure and an adjacent diphenylphosphino donor group (i.e., NHP-DalPhos), as being particularly effective in reactions involving primary alkylamines. Notably, application of the derived precatalyst (NHP-DalPhos)NiCl( o -tolyl) ( C1 ) enabled the typically challenging monoarylation of structurally diverse primary alkylamines with (hetero)aryl chlorides or bromides at room temperature. Also described are the results of our comparative density functional theory computational analysis of nickel-catalyzed primary alkylamine C(sp 2 )–N cross-couplings employing PAd-DalPhos or NHP-DalPhos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".