MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799786212 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.008

0009 A Comparison of the Effects of Gaboxadol and Sleep Restriction on Sleep Depth Assessed by the Odds-Ratio-Product

2018· article· en· W2799786212 on OpenAlexaff
J K Walsh, Paula K. Schweitzer, Kara Griffin, Magdy Younes

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArousalPsychologySleep (system call)PolysomnographyAudiologyElectroencephalographyInternal medicineMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several studies have shown dose-related increases in SWS and low frequency EEG power and reduced wake time and awakenings with gaboxadol (GBX). These changes are similar to those seen with sleep loss, suggesting that GBX may enhance sleep depth. Odds-Ratio-Product (ORP) is a unit-less continuous measure of the relative power in four EEG frequency bands, with values ranging from 0 (deep sleep) to 2.5 (full wakefulness). Excellent correlation was reported between current ORP and probability of arousal in the next 30 seconds (r2=0.98), suggesting that ORP is related to sleep depth. We evaluated the effects of sleep restriction (SR) alone or with GBX on sleep depth using ORP. Forty-one subjects underwent two baseline PSGs followed by four SR nights (5h) with either placebo (21 subjects) or 15 mg GBX (20 subjects). We compared the change from baseline night 2 (first 5h) to SR night 1 and SR night 4 using two measures: ORP during TST and arousal index. During the first SR night, ORP and arousal index did not change with SR alone (-0.01 ± 0.09 and 0.2 ± 3.0/h for ORP and arousal index, respectively; P>.6 for both), but decreased significantly with GBX (-0.11 ± 0.09 and -3.7 ± 5.2/h; P<0.01 for both). These changes were comparable to those observed after four nights of SR alone (-0.07 ± 0.15 and -3.1 ± 3.8/h). The difference in ORP change scores between GBX and SR remained stable across the four SR nights. Importantly, change in ORP was significantly correlated with change in arousal index during the first GBX night (n=20, r=0.50; P<0.02) and when data were pooled across nights and groups (n=82, r=0.46; P<0.001). A single 15 mg dose of GBX reduces ORP and arousal index to the same extent as four nights of SR alone. Augmentation of sleep depth by GBX remains stable across four nights of SR. The correlation between changes in ORP and in arousal index further supports the use of ORP as a continuous measure of sleep depth. Support (If Any):

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207