MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799829821 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721110115

Rewiring of auxin signaling under persistent shade

2018· article· en· W2799829821 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ornella Pucciariello, Martina Legris, Cecilia Costigliolo Rojas, Marı́a José Iglesias, Carlos Esteban Hernando, Carlos A. Dezar, Martı́n Vázquez, Marcelo J. Yanovsky, Scott A. Finlayson, Salomé Prat, Jorge J. Casal

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversidad de Buenos AiresUniversité de LausanneWageningen University and ResearchAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsAuxinShade avoidanceArabidopsisBiologyPhytochromeCell biologyGene expressionArabidopsis thalianaSignal transductionBotanyGeneGeneticsRed lightMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance In agricultural crops, plants are cultivated in close proximity, exposed to mutual shading. Photosensory receptors perceive this light environment and initiate growth responses that adjust the position of plant organs within the canopy to maximize light capture. During the early hours under shade, these responses are mediated by elevated levels of the hormone auxin. Here we show that under prolonged shade, the PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 light-signaling transcription factor, selected auxin receptors, their upstream regulatory miRNA, and downstream transcriptional regulators change their abundance to enhance growth responses, while auxin levels return to those observed before shade. Thus, in the presence of persistent shade, plants elicit a system-level rearrangement of auxin signaling, which sustains growth without increased auxin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207