MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799909020 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky073.015

17 The Impact of Transdermal Flunixin Meglumine on Biomarkers of Pain in Calves When Administered at the Time of Surgical Castration without Local Anesthesia.

2018· article· en· W2799909020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael D. Kleinhenz, Nick Van Engen, Joe S. Smith, Patrick J. Gorden, Chong Wang, S. C. B. Perkins, Johann F. Coetzee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastrationMedicineAnesthesiaPlaceboAnalgesicTransdermalHormoneInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Castration is a common husbandry practice performed on cattle in the United States and Canada. There are numerous reports supporting the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at the time of castration. The objective of this study was to determine the analgesic effects of transdermal flunixin when given at castration. Sixteen intact Holstein male calves were randomly assigned to the castrated group receiving flunixin (CAST-FLU; n = 8) or placebo castrated group (CAST-PLBO; n = 8). Seven steers served as the negative control (SHAM-PLBO) group for pain biomarkers. Flunixin treated calves received topical flunixin meglumine applied to their dorsal midline at the label dose of 3.33 mg/kg during the castration procedure while placebo calves received red-dyed propylene glycol. A surgical castration procedure was performed. Outcomes collected and analyzed included: plasma cortisol, substance P, ocular infrared thermography (IRT), prostaglandin E2, and gait analysis using a force plate (step force, foot contact area, foot contact pressure, impulse). Biomarkers were statistically analyzed using repeated measures with the calf being the repeated measure. There were significant treatment differences in plasma cortisol concentrations over time (P = 0.0016) and the area under the effect curve tended to be different (P = 0.0979). Specifically, there were significant differences in cortisol levels between the CAST-FLU and CAST-PLBO groups at 2, 3, 4, and 12 hours. There were no differences between treatment groups for substance P levels. Mean IRT values tended to be higher for CAST-FLU calves (35.4ºC) compared to CAST-PLBO (34.5ºC) and SHAM-PLBO (34.3ºC) calves (P = 0.06). The total step force applied was similar for all treatment groups. The calves undergoing surgical castration placed more force onto their fore limbs (P = 0.02) compared to the sham calves; indicating a shift in their weight distribution to the front limbs and away from the castration site. There were no measured differences in total step contact area and step contact pressure as part of the gait analysis. SHAM-PLBO calves has lower total impulses compared to CAST-FLU and CAST-PLBO (P = 0.004). Transdermal flunixin had positive effects on cortisol concentrations and mitigation of the stress response for the first 12 hours. Transdermal flunixin provided negligible analgesic effects based on the pain biomarkers of substance P, IRT, and gait analysis when given at the time of castration. More work is needed to investigate transdermal flunixin as part of a multimodal analgesic plan that includes a local anesthetic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaFrench-language works237,207