OUP accepted manuscript
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Apparently conflicting clinical measurements of P-wave duration (PWD) pre- vs. post-ablation have been reported. To assist the interpretation of these clinical data, we used a computer model of the atria and torso to simulate P waves before and after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty ablation patterns were designed (segmental or ipsilateral ablation; five distances to PV sleeves; addition of a roof line or not). Possible PV reconnections were introduced as gaps in the ablation lines. PWD and area were measured during sinus rhythm in vectorcardiogram (VCG) magnitude signals and on the 16-lead ECG before and after ablation, and after PV reconnection. After PV isolation, biatrial activation time was prolonged by 0-5 ms without and by 48±5 ms with roof line. Yet PWD was shortened in lead V3 and V4 by up to 15 ms. The effect of ablation on P-wave morphology was stronger when larger PV areas were isolated. Segmental and ipsilateral PV isolation led to concordant results. P-wave area increased in V1 and decreased in V6. Changes in PWD and area on the VCG were sensitive to the threshold used for detecting the end of the P wave. The occurrence of PV reconnection was best identified on leads V3, V4, and V9. CONCLUSION: PV isolation and reconnection induced measurable changes on the 16-lead ECG that might be used to improve patient follow-up after ablation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".