Bibliographic record
Abstract
No existing book on Jane Austen can boast such a large and varied collection of contemporary critical views as Re-Drawing Austen: Picturesque Travels in Austenland. The essays that compose it are all original and especially conceived for this publication, covering the main orientations in current criticism on Austen, from more traditional angles to the latest developments. The result is an exhaustive and up-to-date Jane Austen Reader that sheds new light on to the Austen phenomenon through an unprecedented critical heterogeneity and the variety of dialogues and debates arising among the many distinctive and authoritative contributions contained in the volume. In particular, the originality of Re-Drawing Austen is inspired by the principles the picturesque aesthetic that perfectly suit both the irony of Austen’s writing and the “openness” and lack of dogmatism of postmodern taste. With its unprecedented breadth and variety, this volume offers readers invaluable insights into the multiple lives of Jane Austen in contemporary culture. \nCONTENTS \nAcnowledgments. Foreword. Introduction: Picturesque Maps of Austenland. \nSection I. Exploring Austen: Perspectives on Austen’s Texts and Cultures. \nBeatrice Battaglia (Univ. of Bologna): ‘Italian lights on English walls’: Jane Austen and the Picturesque. Anne Bermingham (Univ. of California): The Cottage Ornée: Sense, Sensibility, and the Picturesque . William Galperin (Rutgers Univ.): Jane Austen’s Histories of the Present. Gary Kelly (Univ. of Alberta): Jane Austen and the Politics of Style. Joseph Wiesenfarth (Madison Univ.): Three Words of Jane Austen: Courtesy, Civility and Gallantry. Alistair Duckworth (State Univ. of Florida): Manners in Jane Austen’s Novels. Barbara Benedict (Hartford): Austen and Uncertainty. Janet Todd (Univ. of Glasgow): Ivory Miniatures and the Art of Jane Austen . John Wiltshire (La Trobe Univ.): Jane Austen’s England / Jane Austen’s World. Diego Saglia (Univ. of Parma): Bath and the Cultural Geography of Vice. Susan Morgan (Miami Univ. of Ohio): Jane Austen: Travel and International Relations. Roger Sales (Univ. of East Anglia): Paying the Price for the Party: Patricia Rozema’s Version of Mansfield Park. Rosy Colombo [Univ. of Rome 1]: Mansfield Park: the Pleasures of Living. Gabriella Ferreccio (Univ. of Turin): Character and Characters: The Problems of Fanny Price. Michael Hayes (Univ. of Lancaster): Trubetzkoy, Austen and the Evolution of Language.Marinella Rocca Longo (Univ. of Rome 3): Notes on Literary Translation: An Example Based on a Short Analysis of the Language of Jane Austen. Brian Southam (Jane Austen Society of Great Britain): Mansfield Park – What Did Jane Austen Really Write? The Texts of 1814 and 1816. Anna Rosa Scrittori (Univ. of Venice): Rewriting Jane Austen. Daniela Fortezza (Univ. of Bologna): Fay Weldon’s Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen. Cora Kaplan (Univ. of Southampton): Jane Austen, Modern Masculinity, and Crime. Clara Tuite (Univ. of Melbourne): Queer Austen, Anachronism and Critical Practice. \nSection II . Sketches and Prospects: Directions in Contemporary Austen Studies. \nAnne Mellor (UCLA): Directions in Austen Criticism. Ellen Moody (George Mason Univ.): Continent Isolated. Anglocentricity in Austen Criticism. Devoney Looser (Univ. of Missouri-Columbia): Jane Austen in the Twenty First Century. Susan Fraiman (Univ. of Virginia): Dark Austen. Valerie Cossy (Univ. of Lausanne): Austen and her French Readers: Gender and Genre Again. Mirella Agorni-Elena di Giovanni (Univ. of Bologna): Pride and Prejudice in Italy. Gabriella Imposti (Univ. of Bologna): The Reasons for an “absence”: Jane Austen’s Reception in Russia.Sebnem Toplu (U. of Izmir): Love or Pride by Jane 'Austin’: Jane Austen in Turkey. Laura Mooneyham White (Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln): ‘You have politics of course’: The Nuances of Austen and Colonialism.Penny Gay (Univ. of Sidney): Rozema’s Fanny Price: Wild Colonial Girl. Paul Poplawski (Univ. of L...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".