0406 The Effects Of Cbt-i On Cognitive Functioning In Individuals With Insomnia And Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insomnia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are prevalent and often comorbid disorders in older adult populations. Insufficient sleep may exacerbate impaired cognitive functioning, potentially representing a causal factor and treatment target for MCI in some individuals. Supporting this, a recent study demonstrated that Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) not only improves sleep, but also cognitive functioning in older individuals in residential settings with comorbid insomnia and MCI. We sought to extend these findings utilizing an ongoing study of the behavioral and cognitive components of CBT-I in a sample of community-living older adults. Fifty-seven independent-living, older adults (mean age=68.2, 33% male) with insomnia received either the behavioral, cognitive, or both components of CBT-I treatment. All participants were grouped as a single treatment group for this analysis. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline. In addition, the Insomnia Severity Index, D-KEF Color-Word Interference Test (inhibition and task-switching), and Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS; verbal memory recall and recognition) were administered at baseline and six months after treatment. MoCA scores indicated 16 participants with MCI (MoCA < 26) and 41 non-MCI participants. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with one within (time: pre- versus post-treatment) and one between (MCI status: MCI versus non-MCI) subjects factors revealed significant main effects of time in reducing insomnia severity (p<0.0001) as well as improving inhibition (p=0.004) and verbal memory (p=0.007) performance (recall) in both MCI and non-MCI individuals. There were no significant time x MCI status interaction effects for these measures (p’s>0.05). No interaction, nor main effects of time were found for measures of task-switching nor verbal memory recognition (p’s>0.05). These findings replicate and extend work demonstrating that non-pharmacological insomnia treatments can improve insomnia symptoms and may improve cognitive abilities in individuals with and without MCI. They also add additional support to the hypothesis that sleep is an intervention target for improving cognitive abilities in those with insomnia. NIMH 1R01MH101468-01 and the MIRECC at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".