Reforming the United Nations Security Council, Canadian style: the Trudeau era and beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay draws on Canadian archival evidence to examine three Canadian initiatives to promote reform within the United Nations Security Council (UNSC): an effort to institutionalize meetings of council foreign ministers in 1977, one to broaden the Security Council’s mandate in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and Ottawa’s inconsistent attitude toward UNSC enlargement. The Canadian experience reveals both the limitations and the possibilities of non-permanent member and non-member influence on the UNSC in an era of increasing globalization. In short, reform is difficult. Non-permanent members must arrive at the council with a concrete plan, pursue that plan comprehensively, and aim to institute changes that can be sustained without their presence. What came to be known as the human security agenda – an attempt to institutionalize a broader understanding of international security for a post-colonial world – in the mid-1990s ultimately fit those criteria; the other initiatives did not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".