MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800034448 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.376

0377 The Impact of Abuse during Childhood on Adult Sleep and the Moderating Influence of Bedroom Safety

2018· article· en· W2800034448 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Ellis, Célyne Bastien, Ryan Gallagher, Pamela Alfonso‐Miller, Lauren Hale, Charles C. Branas, Michael L. Perlis, Michael A. Grandner

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedroomInsomniaAnxietyBedtimeSleep hygienePsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryMedicineSleep quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure to child abuse may lead to long-term adverse changes in hyperarousal, health, and stress regulation that may predispose the survivor to insomnia and other sleep disturbances in adulthood. This may be especially true when the bedroom is viewed as unsafe. The aim of the present study was to examine whether exposure to child abuse was associated with poor sleep in adulthood and how this was moderated by perceived bedroom safety. A diverse sample of 1,002 community-based adults age 22–60 participated in the Sleep and Healthy Activity, Diet, Environment, and Socialization (SHADES) study. Participants completed measures of sleep - insomnia symptoms (ISI), sleep quality (PSQI) and typical sleep duration, their levels of current perceived bedroom safety (response categories yes or no) and indicated whether they had a history of childhood abuse (defined as either physical or sexual abuse - yes or no). Covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and body mass index. Mediating influence of depression and anxiety were also examined. Of those who completed the survey, 204 (20.36%) indicated a history of childhood abuse and this was associated with poorer sleep in terms of insomnia symptoms, sleep quality and sleep duration. A safety-by-abuse interaction was significant for insomnia, sleep quality, and sleep duration. In stratified analyses, those who suffered abuse but perceived their sleep environment as safe reported worse insomnia (B=2.39, p<0.0001) and sleep quality (B=1.47, p<0.0001) and shorter sleep duration (B=-0.40, p=0.006) relative to those with no history of abuse. In those whose sleep environment was perceived as unsafe, the impact of abuse was 20% greater for insomnia, 52% greater for sleep quality and 38% reduced for sleep duration. When depression/anxiety were included in models, relationships were generally maintained. The findings suggest that abuse history may impact presentation of insomnia, and appears to be amplified by perceiving the bedroom as an unsafe environment. Both history of abuse and perceived bedroom safety should be routinely asked and accounted for by sleep clinicians. Support (If Any):

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207