Effect of water saturation on gas slippage in circular and angular pores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A unified model for gas slip flow through circular and angular pores in both single phase flow and two‐phase flow conditions is developed, and the effect of water saturation on gas slippage factors in different pore shapes are revealed. For circular pores, the water saturation retains as thin film binding on pore surfaces without changing the shape of the cross section, and the hydraulic diameters continuously reduce as water saturation increases, directly leading to an increase in the slippage factor. However, for angular pores, the water saturation retains as both films at boundaries and condensations at corners, and the film‐water and corner‐water gradually change their cross‐section shape (from sharp corners to round corners), which further affects the gas slip behavior. Due to the presence of round corners, the ratio of the cross‐sectional area and perimeter, which can also be regarded as the reciprocal of a specific surface area, can even increase at a low water saturation condition. Thus the collisions between gas molecules and pore boundaries weaken, resulting in a slight reduction in the gas slippage factor. This interesting finding in the angular pore case directly explains the contradiction of the published experimental results with the general knowledge (i.e., the gas slip factor always increases as water saturation increases). Thus, the validity of the common assumption regarding actual porous media as capillaries with a circular cross‐section must be considered more carefully. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 64: 3529–3541, 2018
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".