MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800291315 · doi:10.3357/amhp.4867.2018

The Aeromedical Management of Allergic Rhinitis

2018· article· en· W2800291315 on OpenAlex
Nicole Powell-Dunford, Charles L. Reese, Alaistair Bushby, Berit H. Munkeby, Sébastien Coste, Višnja Livajić Pezer, Lars Rosenkvist

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerospace Medicine and Human Performance · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumMedicineAviation medicineMedical emergencyAeronauticsEngineeringPathologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Allergic rhinitis is a prevalent condition warranting special aeromedical consideration due to its potential for acute and painful manifestations involving the middle ear or paranasal sinuses during rapid barometric pressure changes. Although second generation antihistamines and intranasal steroids are safe and effective treatments for this common condition, aeromedical management varies. METHODS: An aeromedical policy review of 14 public access civil and military data repositories was undertaken. Policy within a convenience sample of nine countries (Australia, Canada, Croatia, France, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States) was further ascertained through subject matter expert consultation. A convenience sample of recent primary care review articles and ENT guidelines were reviewed in order to substantiate the evidence basis for aeromedical practices. RESULTS: Policies range from disqualification of flight applicants with any history of allergic rhinitis to the authorization of short-term, select undeclared medication use for the management of mild symptoms, with military authorities applying a more conservative approach. A range of intranasal and oral therapies are approved and requirements for waiver vary across most authorities. DISCUSSION: Variation in practices must be considered when managing flight crews as part of military coalition peacetime and combat operations, as well as for international civil aviation missions conducted in support of natural disaster relief, rescue, and other stability efforts. Standardization of approved therapies for allergic rhinitis could be a useful starting point for the harmonization of aeromedical global policies in the future. Beneficial national specific policy updates may be undertaken on the basis of international experience.Powell-Dunford N, Reese C, Bushby A, Munkeby BH, Coste S, Pezer VL, Rosenkvist L. The aeromedical management of allergic rhinitis. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(5):453-463.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it