Je Me Souviens (Maintenant): Altérité, Indianité et Mémoire Collective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is about the will to remember as a political imperative in Quebec. Francis Leclerc’s Mémoires affectives (2004) explicitly anchors this will to remember in the multicultural and pluriethnic reality of modern Quebec. In the film, the quest for Self occurs principally through a dialogical relationship with “the Other,” the immigrant, who serves to participate in and reflect the stabilization of an identity and a memory from which he or she is nonetheless excluded, like an external witness. Beyond the immigrant, and more fundamentally, through the essentialist and archaistic posturing of the ahistorical, apolitical, and peripheral Indian body, the memory of the Self is woven, taking root in soil that is inhabited by and inhabits an identity of privilege. This critical analysis of the film serves to illustrate some of the discursive and representational strategies employed by recent Quebecois cinema in its attempt to respond to the increasingly complex and ambiguous colonial status of modern Quebec. It is also a response to the nation’s historical link to alterity — its own alterity and that of its “Others.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".