MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800504509 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2829823

Silicon Photonic Integrated Optoelectronic Oscillator for Frequency-Tunable Microwave Generation

2018· article· en· W2800504509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhotonicsResonatorPhase noiseRadio transmitter designPhase modulationSilicon photonicsMicrowaveModulation (music)Radio frequencyAmplifierBand-pass filterOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsCMOSTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic generation of a frequency-tunable microwave signal based on a silicon photonic integrated optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The silicon photonic chip includes a high-speed phase modulator (PM), a thermally tunable micro-disk resonator (MDR), and a high-speed photodetector (PD). When an external light wave is injected into the chip, by a joint use of the PM, the MDR, and the PD, a bandpass microwave photonic filter (MPF) based on phase modulation and phase-modulation to intensity-modulation (PM-IM) conversion is realized. If the output microwave signal from the MPF is fed to the microwave input port of the PM with a sufficiently large gain provided by an electrical amplifier, the MPF becomes an OEO. By controlling the electrical power applied to a micro-heater, the resonance frequency of the MDR is tuned, which leads to the tuning of the MPF, and thus, the OEO oscillation frequency. In the experimental demonstration, two silicon photonic integrated OEOs using two MDRs with different micro-heaters are studied. The first OEO has a high-resistivity metallic micro-heater placed on top of the MDR, and the second OEO has a p-type doped silicon heater in the MDR. The two thermally tunable MDRs are characterized, and the performance of the MPFs based on the two MDRs is evaluated. The use of the two MPFs to implement two OEOs is performed, and their performance is evaluated in terms of frequency tunable range, phase noise, and power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it