The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Carfentanil After Recreational Exposure: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carfentanil and related fentanyl analogs have been linked to a number of overdose deaths from drug users in several cities across North America. Diagnosis of carfentanil exposure requires a very high index of clinical suspicion, especially because available laboratory narcotic screens do not detect this agent. We describe a 34-year-old man admitted with depressed level of consciousness and in respiratory failure after recreational exposure to a white powder later inferred to contain carfentanil. Urine and whole blood samples were obtained for conventional preliminary drug screen immunoassays for unknown exposures, in addition to utilizing a high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of carfentanil and its metabolite. The patient was intubated and required mechanically assisted ventilation for 31 hours until he was able to breathe safely on his own. Pharmacokinetic modeling of three timed blood samples identified the elimination half-life as 5.7 hours for carfentanil and 11.8 hours for the norcarfentanil metabolite. Awakening and breathing spontaneously corresponded to an interpolated blood carfentanil concentration of 0.52 ng/ml. This is the first pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic case report on the recreational use of carfentanil. Critical care clinicians should anticipate long periods of ventilatory support in the care of patients exposed to carfentanil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".