CALCULATION OF ADDITIONAL AXIAL FORCE OF ANGULAR-CONTACT BALL BEARINGS IN ROTOR SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on a loading-deformation relationship of bearing elements and the coordination of displacement between bearings in the rotor system, a model for calculating the additional axial force of angular-contact ball bearings in a single-rotor system is established. Nonlinear equations of this model are solved through the Rapid Descent method and Newton-Raphson method. The simulation results which are based on Gupta’s example verify that both the model and solving methods in this paper are reliable. A pair of 276927NK1W1(H) angular-contact ball bearings in symmetry in the single-rotor system is used as the example, calculation results of the additional axial force of bearings from the model in this paper and from the ISO method are compared and the influence of bearing geometry parameters and working conditions on the additional axial force is further studied. This model and its conclusions could provide the basic data and reference for analyzing the carrying ability and dynamic properties of rolling bearings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".