Experimental Investigation on the Nanosilica-Reinforcing Polyacrylamide/Polyethylenimine Hydrogel for Water Shutoff Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyacrylamide hydrogel used in conformance control is subjected to poor stability at an elevated temperature. In this paper, nanosilica has been found to be a very effective stabilizing agent for the polyacrylamide/polyethylenimine hydrogel, and the reinforcing performance of nanosilica on the hydrogel was investigated in detail. The result showed that the strength of hydrogel is enhanced obviously by the nanosilica, and the hydrogel syneresis is also significantly inhibited by the nanosilica, which can increase the hydrogel stability time from 18 to 180 days at 130 °C. Besides, nanosilica can increase the shear viscosity and hydrodynamic radius of polyacrylamide, and the bound water in the hydrogel is also grown in the presence of nanosilica. In comparison to the micromorphology of common hydrogel, the dense and strong mesh structure is formed as a result of the reinforcing behavior of nanosilica. According to the above results, it is inferred that the silanol group of nanosilica cross-links with the amidogen of polyacrylamide via the hydrogen bond, which is considered as the primary cause of the reinforcing performance of nanosilica for the hydrogel. In addition, as a result of the improving strength and stability and increasing absorption of the polymer to rock surface, the hydrogel enhanced by nanosilica has a higher water shutoff ratio and residual resistance factor and a longer period of validity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".