MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 17587: Implications of Angina Pectoris on Quality of Life, Functional Capacity and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Insights From HF-ACTION

2015· article· en· W2800867183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert J. Mentz, Kishan S. Parikh, Adrian Coles, Phillip J. Schulte, William E. Kraus, Jerome L. Fleg, Steven J. Keteyian, Ileana L. Piña, Mona Fiuzat, David J. Whellan, Christopher M. O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureQuality of life (healthcare)AnginaInternal medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyProportional hazards modelMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Angina pectoris (AP) is associated with worse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients, but less is known about implications on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional capacity. Methods: We assessed HRQoL, functional capacity and outcomes in chronic HF patients with reduced EF in the HF-ACTION trial of usual care +/- exercise training based on whether patients had AP. AP was patient-reported based on recent symptoms or development during exercise testing. We assessed all-cause mortality/hospitalization in patients with AP vs. no AP using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. We assessed for an interaction between AP status and exercise training with respect to outcomes and the change in quality of life and functional capacity from baseline to 3 months. Results: In HF-ACTION, 406 (17%) patients had AP at baseline with 44% of these reporting ≥ class II symptoms. Patients with AP more often had ischemic etiology, but had similar EF, NT-proBNP and beta-blocker use. Baseline 6-minute walk distance and peak VO 2 were similar in both groups, but patients with AP had worse depressive symptoms and HRQoL. After risk adjustment, AP was associated with a 22% greater risk of all-cause mortality/hospitalization (Figure). There was evidence of an interaction between baseline AP and exercise training on change in peak VO 2 (P=0.019), but not for HRQoL or clinical outcomes. The median change in peak VO 2 with exercise training was 0.8 mL/kg/min with AP vs. 0.6 mL/kg/min without AP. Conclusion: AP was associated with worse HRQoL and more depressive symptoms. Despite a greater improvement in peak VO 2 with exercise training, patients with AP experienced more adverse events. Clinicians should consider routine assessment and management of AP in HF patients as well as the associated symptoms related to depression and implications on quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→