MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on carotid chemoreceptor activity and sensitivity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2019· article· en· W2800990764 on OpenAlexafffund
Bradley W. Byers, Desi P. Fuhr, Linn E. Moore, Mohit Bhutani, Eric Wong, Michael K. Stickland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsCovenant HealthUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCOPDCardiologyPulmonary rehabilitationInternal medicinePulmonary function testingChemoreceptorHypoxia (environmental)HyperoxiaVentilation (architecture)AnesthesiaVital capacityLung volumesHeart rateBlood pressureLungLung functionOxygenReceptorDiffusing capacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent work demonstrates that carotid chemoreceptor (CC) activity/sensitivity is elevated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with healthy controls, and this elevated chemoreception appears to contribute to increased cardiovascular risk. Exercise training has been shown to normalize CC activity/sensitivity in other populations, and therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can reduce CC activity/sensitivity in COPD. Forty-five COPD patients [mean FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) = 56.6% predicted] completed PR, while 15 COPD patients (mean FEV1 = 74.6% predicted) served as non-PR controls. CC activity was determined by the reduction in ventilation while breathing transient hyperoxia ([Formula: see text] = 1.0); CC sensitivity was evaluated by the increase in ventilation relative to the drop in arterial saturation while breathing hypoxia. Dyspnea, six-minute walk and autonomic function data were also obtained. PR improved 6-minute walk distance ( P < 0.001) and dyspnea ( P = 0.04); however, there was no effect on CC activity ( P = 0.60), sensitivity ( P = 0.69), or autonomic function ( P > 0.05 for all). Subgroup analyses indicated that PR reduced CC activity in those with elevated baseline CC activity, independent of changes in autonomic function. No change in dyspnea ( P = 0.24), CC activity ( P = 0.19), sensitivity ( P = 0.80), or autonomic function ( P > 0.05 for all) was observed in the control group. Despite improvements in exercise tolerance and dyspnea, PR appears to be generally ineffective at reducing CC sensitivity in stable COPD patients; while PR reduced CC activity in those with elevated basal CC activity, the physiological significance of this is unclear. Further investigations aimed at improving CC function in COPD are needed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While work in other chronic diseases has shown that exercise training may help normalize carotid chemoreceptor (CC) activity/sensitivity, the current study found that exercise training through pulmonary rehabilitation did not consistently reduce CC activity/sensitivity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These results suggest that other interventions are needed to normalize CC activity/sensitivity in COPD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207